Friday, December 31, 2010

My brother Kyle on CD101.com tonight from 930p through midnight!

Listen live to my brother's debut DJ gig, on cd101.com. Bring in the new year with my bro, Kyle Hofmeister!

Jake Hofmeister

Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Greater Toledo Islamic Center

The mosque rises out of the northwestern Ohio cornfields, a reminder of America's pluralism. I stopped in and chatted with two founding members and snapped some pictures. The center has around 400 members, and 30 students in their Islamic school.  Established in 1982, they hope to add on to the complex by expanding the school and building a residential community.  I was surprised to hear that this was just one of 5 Islamic centers in Toledo, an illustration of just how religiously diverse America is becoming. 

Jake Hofmeister

Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Christmas Eve service at Jonesville First Presbyterian

Emily's sermon focused on where we find hope, peace, joy, and love in the birth narrative of Jesus. There were over 150 in attendance!

Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Pokagon Tobaggan Run with Mom and Dad!

We had breakfast at the Potowatomi Inn then did about 5 runs on the refrigerated Tobaggan run at the park. It' about a quarter mile long. Mom, Dad, and I got the sled up to almost 40mph. We were going so fast we almost hit the lodge after continuing past the rubber mat stopping area. It was a lot of fun. Mom told me stories of the old days, including the hilarity of seeing Poppy try to get his lanky legs and big feet inside the sled (and you have to intertwine yourself with the others on the sled), and Carol getting taken out at the bottom. What a great place for family memories.

Jake Hofmeister

Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

St. Catherine Monastery: A History of Pluralism

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/21/10-untamed-roads-worth-a-_n_799429.h...

As I was reading the above HuffPost article, as I love reading about
adventurous roads throughout the world in hopes to someday traverse
them on my KTM 990 motorbike, I came across the road that travels to
St. Catherine's Monastery, Sinai, Egypt. Now I'm sure the road to the
monastery boasts compelling vistas (the Sinai looks more like a lunar
landscape perfect for many outdoor activities), but the real adventure
lies within the walls of the monastery and on the journey to the
summit of Moses Mountain (what the Muslim bedouins call Mt. Sinai).

When I was in seminary in 2006, I had the privilege to tag along with
my brother's undergraduate study abroad class to Greece, Turkey, and
Egypt. The class was called Sacred Byzaniutm. We studied Byzantine
Christianity, but also the other world religions of the region like
Egyptian and Greco-Roman traditions, as well as Islam. Our last
destination was St. Catherine Monastery.

St. Catherine's has its origins in the 3rd or 4th century as a Greek
Orthodox monastic community. It is built on the site of the burning
bush through which YHWH appeared to Moses, and the bush is living to
this day inside the monastery walls.  Visitors, pilgrims have created
a custom to place written prayers among the vines of this rather
sizeable bush growing in the midst of an absolutely barren landscape.
And not only is the burning bush there, but the monastery sits at the
base of the famous Mt. Sinai where Moses received the tablets upon
which the ten commandments were written (he actually received them
twice if you remember the story, the first set were shattered in the
golden calf fiasco).

But for me, the most amazing aspect of the monastery at Moses Mountain
is its history of participation in the interfaith movement. The
monastery contains one of the world's most important and extensive
religious libraries. Ancient manuscripts abound, some of which are
the oldest translations of Christian sacred scriptures. As the
resident librarian monk, who hailed from El Paso, energetically told
stories relating to the manuscripts, one story really caught my
attention. The library had an original letter written by the Prophet
Mohammad, SAW. During the rise of the Prophet, SAW, and his followers
in the Arab world, as the area including Egypt became (pre)Islamic,
Mohammad, SAW, had written a letter to give to the Christian monks of
St. Catherine. The letter was a peace offering to the monks, outlining
Mohammad's, SAW, respect for their tradition, assertion of their value
as friends of Islam, and the letter finally charged the Bedouin
Muslims that lived around the monastery to protect the monastery from
intruders, and to live in harmony with them as people of different
faith in one community. That began what is now a 1500 year old
interfaith community of cooperation. The bedouins still live in
harmony with the monks, sharing resources, meals, and small business
in the area.offers of the interfaith business ventures offers a camel
caravan for pilgrims to ride up to the summit of Moses Mountain.

My brother, myself, and our friend Joe Aziz decided to pass on the
camels and ascend the mountain by foot. They have preserved the Path
of Moses, which is also called the path of repentance, which ascends
3700 steps to an elevation of 7500. We decided to try that pilgrim
path, the same path of many monks and pilgrims who followed in the
footsteps of Moses.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1315607054931&set=a.1377599204696.5339...

But the most striking part of the journey was at the summit, where I
found 3 religious sites, commemorating YHWH's conversation with Moses.
There was a Jewish, Christian, and Muslim site. All three faiths
sharing the story, the wonder, the mystery of this great event. I
remember sitting at the top, not thinking of my Christisn identity,
per se, but how I felt so connected to both Judaism and Islam. I
wondered how our how our relationships with each other can be
sometimes so strained and divisive, when we have a tradition of being
a community of cooperation, love, and respect, in places like Sinai, a
most holy and miraculous place, for hundreds of years. I hope, in a
time of religious turmoil, in a time when advocating for religious
pluralism may be our most pressing task as a community, I hope that
the interfaith history, the interfaith story of Mt. Sinai, written by
our most revered prophets and characters shared by our shared
Abrahamic faiths, can serve as a beacon of hope, a movement of the
spirit of God, that can guide us along the Path of Moses, the path of
repentance, the path of interfaith cooperation.

Jake Hofmeister

Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Christmas Pageant

Rev. Emily and her new church, Jonesville First!

And yes there are about 80 folks here, but like good Presbyterians, they don't like to sit in the front rows.

Jake Hofmeister

Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Saw this at the Detroit Airport, very cool

The room had the cardinal directions labeled, and prayer rugs were provided. Detroit is pluralism sensitive!

Jake Hofmeister

Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

Thursday, December 16, 2010

My musings on the change-producing effects of pluralistic, multi-faith communities upon our religious identities, committments, and groups/traditions

From her book, A New Religious America, Diana Eck writes, '...our religious traditions are constantly influencing one another.  Christians encounter the faith of new Sikh and Hindu neighbors and rethink what it means to speak of God's universal providence.  A Lutheran undersecretary of defense finds himself addressing Muslims at the Pentagon on the holiest night of the Muslim year. Jews in Sacramento find new allies in Christian and Muslim neighbors in the wake of synagogue burnings.  Christians in Roslindale find themselves moved by the spirit of forgiveness they find in their Viatnamese Buddhist neighbors.' 
 
So what do you think about the effect of constant multi-faith encounters, especially on our personal religious identity, committments, and our particular faith group's religious identity (assuming that the person(s) are open and vulnerable to listening and empathizing with the religious other, honestly dialogue about agreements and disagreements on worldview, participating in the other's customs, etc.?  Diana Eck defines a truly pluralist environment as:
  • First, pluralism is not diversity alone, but the energetic engagement with diversity. Diversity can and has meant the creation of religious ghettoes with little traffic between or among them. Today, religious diversity is a given, but pluralism is not a given; it is an achievement. Mere diversity without real encounter and relationship will yield increasing tensions in our societies.
  • Second, pluralism is not just tolerance, but the active seeking of understanding across lines of difference. Tolerance is a necessary public virtue, but it does not require Christians and Muslims, Hindus, Jews, and ardent secularists to know anything about one another. Tolerance is too thin a foundation for a world of religious difference and proximity. It does nothing to remove our ignorance of one another, and leaves in place the stereotype, the half-truth, the fears that underlie old patterns of division and violence. In the world in which we live today, our ignorance of one another will be increasingly costly.)
  •  
    The Effect of Strenghtening 'Home' Tradition
    As a Christian, is my Christianity strenghtened by encountering other religions?  For example, when I observe and experience Buddhist Meditation and the spiritual discipline of awareness by dialoguing with buddhist students, and then in response, does my Christian faith identity become stronger and fuller (become more Christian)  because I am encouraged to find similar spiritual disciplines like contemplation and centering prayer in my own tradition (this is Eboo Patel's take, the Interfaith Youth Core founder), and then incorporate them into my practice and committment?  This effect is especially the result of people engaged in pluralism who believed their faith is revealed truth and exclusive or the best way.  But it's not that they are total unaffected by the other religious encounter in terms of the other, not just the change in their own religious home tradition.  One can develop a real awe or 'holy envy,' as Diana Eck has said, for the other tradition that connects us and keeps us at the 'table' together, breaking down walls, and destroying prejudice. 
     
    The Effect of Multiple 'Home' Traditions
    As a child, I attended a Jewish pre-school and simultaneously attending Church and sunday school.  Simultaneously, at the beginning of my development, I was part and participant in two religious traditions.  Reciting 'Baruch atah' is as comfortable and natural, even inherent to my being, as reciting 'Our Father.'  Is this like being born in a bi-lingual family?  This effect is similar to the following effect.
     
    The character Pi in Life of Pi is a Multiple 'Home' Tradition' as he adheres to Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism.  In the book, his parents and religious leaders believe he is only one of the three religions, but Pi has other ideas.
     
        After the "Hellos" and the "Good days", there was an awkward silence. The priest broke it when he said, with pride in his voice, "Piscine is a good Christian boy. I hope to see him join our choir soon."

        My parents, the pandit and the imam looked surprised.

        "You must be mistaken. He's a good Muslim boy. He comes without fail to Friday prayer, and his knowledge of the Holy Qur'an is coming along nicely." So said the imam.

        My parents, the priest and the pandit looked incredulous.

        The pandit spoke. "You're both wrong. He's a good Hindu boy. I see him all the time at the temple coming for darshan and performing puja."

        My parents, the imam and priest looked astounded.

        "There is no mistake," said the priest. "I know this boy. He is Piscine Molitor Patel and he's a Christian."

        "I know him too, and I tell you he's a Muslim," asserted the imam.

        "Nonsense!" cried the pandit. "Piscene was born a Hindu, lives a Hindu and will die a Hindu!"

        The three wise men stared at each other, breathless and disbelieving.

        Lord, avert their eyes from me, I whispered in my soul.

        All eyes fell upon me

    Pi didn't see a problem by being 3 traditions at once.  He later likened to having multiple passports, being a dual or multiple citizen
     
    The Effect of More Complex Multi-Religious Identity, Traditions
    Can I acquire additional religious identity, becoming wholly Christian and also part Hindu, when I personally integrate yoga into my identity that I learned from and practice with my Hindu friends?  If this were the case, then complexity of my identity grows.  This would especially be the case if my tradition did not containt a similar or equivalent spiritual discipline, that addressed that same need.  And in this, I don't become more fully Christian, but I am (still fully?) Christian and also Hindu because I have committed myself to Christian disciplines and Hindu disciplines.  And if my friends also incorporate yoga alongside their Christian identities, then the group identity becomes more complex as well. Would this be like speaking English as my native tongue, but also speaking other languages like German as well?  Or maybe it's like always having your immediate/extended family, but then becoming a member of another family through marriage or friendship, etc., simultaneously holding both identities?  In this case, I am still fully Christian, but have supplemented my Christian identity with a Hindu practice/committment, remaing Christian, but taking on a (partial) Hindu identity as well, that is beyond my already whole Christian identity.  And whether learning this new language or becoming a member of another family is in the past or present, these are still part of your religious story and memory, which will have a lasting effect on identity and the group practice of religion.
     
    I contradict myself?
    Very well, then, I contradict myself. 
    I am large,
    I contain multitudes. 
    -Walt Whitman
     
    The Effect of a Syncretist Identity, Traditions
    Let's face it, religions have been borrowing, incorporating, and blending beliefs and customs since the beginning of time.  Pagan Yule and Christian Christmas was blended.  Greek Orthodoxy and really much of Christendom incorporated Greco-Roman philosophy and religion into the faith. This is syncretism, and I call it less complex because the two or more are blended together into one or a whole, rather than the two or more fully existing alongside each other (as the above effects suggest) within a person or group's religious identity.  The Abrahamic faiths have syncreetist parts to them, as well as Bahai'i and Unitatrian Universalism and many other faiths.  Syncretism happens either subconsciously or consciously, and more visibly and purposely happens with inclusive/universal religious philosophies, as opposed to exclusive, revelation-driven religious schemas.  One can argue that syncretism exists within (and possibly is causal) in the creation of every religion, even those with revelation as a central tenet.  Jesus was revealed truth to followers (who became Christians), however, Jesus' revealed truth can be found in Jewish/Israelite theology.  One example I observe happening often in America, especially since information is so widely available and since America values indepence and consumerism, individuals can 'shop' for a religion by taking parts of many other religions and spiritualities as they see fit.  Especially with a more private, free, inclusive, or universal mass mindset, forms of religion are as many as there are people or groups in America.
     
    I believe all of these effects are happening , through the interwoven and complex web of America's religiousity. And all effects manifest in any combination simultaneously and respectively to persons and groups across America.  In other words, persons and groups can experience any number of these effects, any combination, at any time.  These effects of multi-faith encounters are constantly changing and influincing our identities and our committments and our respective, particular religions. 
     
    The strenthening of one's 'home' tradition, is clearer and possibly easier to accept and deal with as we try to live into a pluralistic community.  It seems to be the more scholarly acceptable stance as well.  On Diana Eck's The Pluralism Project website,the second part of her definition of pluralism applies to this:
    • Third, pluralism is not relativism, but the encounter of commitments. The new paradigm of pluralism does not require us to leave our identities and our commitments behind, for pluralism is the encounter of commitments. It means holding our deepest differences, even our religious differences, not in isolation, but in relationship to one another.
    • Fourth, pluralism is based on dialogue. The language of pluralism is that of dialogue and encounter, give and take, criticism and self-criticism. Dialogue means both speaking and listening, and that process reveals both common understandings and real differences. Dialogue does not mean everyone at the “table” will agree with one another. Pluralism involves the commitment to being at the table -- with one’s commitments.

    This 'new paradigm' of pluralism that retains or strengthens ones own identity is noble and attempts to preserve the diversity and sacredness of the unique religions. It also commends us attempt a very difficult spiritual and emotional task of loving another who disagrees about the most important and pressing questions of human existance.  That's quite difficult, and for our purposes as an American community might be a wonderful and necessary paradigm to follow...to disagree on religious tradition and philosophy, but to exist in relationship and love each other and respect each other, making our communities better by working as a whole. 

    However, the other effects are also happening, whether one likes it or not, whether one agrees with it or not.  I do agree there are positives and negatives to both the paradigm suggested by Diana Eck and Eboo Patel, and there are positives and negatives about the multi-faith and synctretist effects as well, especially as our American society becomes more diverse religiously, as we are living closer together among diversity, as the internet and social media creates instant global connections and provides multitudes of religious information and even the reality of cyber-religious communities, the blending or combining of religious traditions is a reality.  For some people, retaining a particular religious identity in the face of pluralism, is not possible.  They are willing to sacrifice the particularity for a more inclusive world-view and a multiple or combined faith identity, in hopes to refrain from hurting others and in order to create deeper and more real connections with others.  Further, love seems to be the deepest connector of all.  Love is something we all share, something that can bridge the deepest divide and breakdown the strongest wall of prejudice.   

    "Whenever I groan within myself and think how hard it is to keep writing about love in these times of tension and strife which may, at any moment, become for us all a time of terror, I think to myself: What else is the world interested in? What else do we all want, each one of us, except to love and be loved, in our families, in our work, in all our relationships? God is Love. Love casts out fear. Even the most ardent revolutionist, seeking to change the world, to overturn the tables of the money changers, is trying to make a world where it is easier for people to love, to stand in that relationship to each other…There can never be enough of it."
    - Dorothy Day

    Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

    Today is Ashura: Shi'a Islam's Day of Sorrow and Inspiration

     
    A wonderful and tragic story of the Prophet Muhammad's SAW (I learned this is the abbreviation for 'upon him be peace,' which is the honorific designation for the Prophet SAW) grandson, Hussein AS, and his faithfulness in the face of impending harm. 

    Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister

    Wednesday, December 8, 2010

    My speech on the Interfaith Movement. I delivered it today at Trinity Valley School in Fort Worth. The whole upper school was in attendance, 400 students or so.

    Thank you so much for inviting me to speak with you today.  I am extremely impressed with Trinity Valley School, and its commitment to academic excellence and the education of the whole person as a member of the global community, as we, humans, are not just intellectual beings but spiritual beings, and we are not just citizens of Fort Worth or Texas, but of the world. 

     

    I’ve been asked to share my thoughts with you on the growing Interfaith movement.  I will be referring to this movement throughout the lecture as Interfaith dialogue, Interfaith cooperation, and pluralism.  Essentially, these three terms are synonymous.  But before I go into specifically defining those terms, I would like to retell two stories that Eboo Patel shares in his book titled Acts of Faith.  Patel founded the Interfaith Youth Core which helps high schools and colleges create multi-faith communities.  He is an official advisor to the president through the Whitehouse office of interfaith and neighbor partnerships.  Patel is an Indian-American Muslim. 

     

    The first story is this:  A man named Eric Rudolph sits in court and pleads guilty. But he is not sorry. He’s not sorry for the nail bomb that he detonated at the Women’s Heath Clinic in Birmingham, Alabama, that killed a police officer and left a nurse injured. He’s not sorry for the bomb at the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta that killed one, injured dozens and sent shock waves of fear through the global community. He’s not sorry for his hateful letter stating, “We declare and will wage total war on the ungodly, communist regime in New York and you legislative bureaucratic lackeys in Washington,” signed “The Army of God.” He’s not sorry for defiling the Holy Bible by writing “bomb” in the margin of his copy.

               

    In fact, Rudolph is proud and defiant. He lectures the judge on the righteousness of his actions. He states that abortion, homosexuality, and all hints of “global socialism” still need to be “ruthlessly opposed.” He does this in the name of Christianity, quoting from the New Testament:”I have fought the food fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith.”

               

    The judge sentenced Rudolph to life in prison, compared him to the Nazis, and said that he was shocked at Rudolph’s lack of remorse. But many others felt a twitch of pride.

               

    Eric Rudolph might have been a loner, but he did not act alone. He was produced by a movement and encouraged by a culture. In the woods of western North Carolina, where Rudolph evaded federal agents for five years, people cheered him on, helped him hide, made T-shirts that said Run Rudolph Run. The day he was finally caught, a woman from the area was quoted as saying “Rudolph’s a Christian, I’m a Christian… Those are our values. These are our woods.”

               

    Of all the information published about Rudolph, one sentence is very telling: Rudolph wrote an essay denying the Holocaust when he was in high school. How does a teenager come to hold such a view? 

               

    The answer is simple: people taught him. Eric Rudolph was always in trouble and never quite fit in.  His father died when he was young.  His mother followed men who preached a theology of hate.  Eric was soon drawing Nazi symbols in his schoolbooks. Then a pastor named Dan Gayman assumed a fatherly relationship with Eric, enrolled him in hatemongering Christian Identity youth programs. Gayman taught Rudolph that the Bible was the history of the Aryan whites and that the Jews were the spawn of Satan and part of a tribe called “the mud people.” He taught Rudolph that the world was nearing a final struggle between God’s people and Satan’s servants and it was up to the Aryans to ensure victory for the right race.  Rudolph carved swastikas into this mother’s living room furniture.  Under the tutelage of Gayman and other radical preachers, Eric Rudolph’s hate did what hate always does: it spread.

                           

    The second story is about the middle School students in Whitwell, TN.  These students are giving tours of one of the most profound Holocaust memorials anywhere in the world: A German railcar that was used to transport Jews to Auschwitz.  The young people ask guests to imagine how it might feel to be one of the eighty Jews packed into that tight space, as the train took them to torture and death. They explain that the railcar is filled with millions of paperclips, each one a symbol of a Jew murdered by the Nazis. One student says that to see a paper clip now is to think of a soul. The sign at the entrance of the memorial reads: ”We ask you to pause and reflect on the evil of intolerance and hatred.” The sign on the way out states: “What can I do to spread the message of love and tolerance these children have demonstrated with this memorial?”

               

    One Whitwell student tour guide, about to graduate from eighth grade, reflects, “In the future, when I come back and see it, knowing that I was here to do this, it will be not just a memory, but kind of like in your heart, that you’ve changed the way that people think about other people.”

               

    Whitwell is a town of fewer than two thousand residents, located outside Chattanooga in the coal mining region of southeastern Tennessee, about a hundred miles from where the Ku Klux Klan was born. It has two traffic lights and a whole lot of God Bless America signs. The mines closed thirty years ago, leaving the region even poorer than it was before. You can count the number of black and Latino families on two hands. There aren’t any Catholics, Jews, or Muslims.

               

    Why would white protestant kids in a poor region with a history of prejudice care so much about educating people about Judaism? The answer is simple: people taught them. The principal of Whitwell Middle School, Linda Hooper, wanted the students in her school to learn about cultures and people who are different from themselves. “Our children, they are respectful; they are thoughtful; they are caring. But they are pretty much homogeneous. When we come up to someone who is not like us, we don’t have a clue.”

               

    She sent a teacher to a diversity conference, and he came back with the idea of a holocaust education project. “This was our need,” Hooper said.

               

    Over the next several years, the students at Whitwell studied that horrible time, met with Holocaust survivors, learned about the rich tradition of Judaism, and taught all the people they touched about the powerful role that young people can play in advocating for pluralism.

               

    Lena Gitter, a ninety-five-year-old Holocaust survivor, heard about the project and wrote the students a letter, it reads: “I witnessed what intolerance and indifference can lead to. I am thankful that late in life I can see and hear that the teaching of pluralism is alive and well and bears fruit. When you ask youth, they will do the right thing. With tears in my eyes, I bow my head before you. Shalom.”

               

    Eric Rudolph and the young people of Whitwell are two very different responses to one of the most important questions of our time: in a world of passionate religiosity and intense interaction, how will people from different faith backgrounds engage one another? Rudolph responded to people who were different by building bombs of destruction. The students of Whitwell responded to diversity by building bridges of understanding. Rudolph is a religious totalitarian. The students of Whitwell are religious pluralist. They are on different sides of the faith line.

               

    One hundred years ago, the great African-American scholar W.E.B. Dubois famously said. “The problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color line.” The twenty-first century will be shaped by the question of the faith line. On one side of the faith line are the religious totalitarians. Their conviction is that only one interpretation of one religion is a legitimate way of being, believing, and belonging on earth. Everyone else needs to be bullied, or converted, or condemned, or killed.

     

    On the other side of the faith line are the religious pluralists, who hold that people believing in different creeds and belonging to different communities need to learn to live together. Religious pluralism is neither mere coexistence, nor forced consensus. It is a form of proactive cooperation that affirms the identity of the unique religious traditions while emphasizing that the well being of each and all depends on the health of the whole. It is the belief that the common good is best served when each community has a chance to make its unique contribution. 

     

    We all have to answer this question of the 21st century: Will I be part of the interfaith movement for pluralism and cooperation?

     

    For me, answering this faith line question has been my deepest passion.  My story begins in 1984 when I attended preschool at the Jewish Community Center in Columbus, Ohio.  My parents were both Protestant Christians and I was baptized Presbyterian as an infant.  However, my earliest memories of school were with Jewish children and teachers.  We prayed in Hebrew, ate latkas and cholla, and learned the Jewish traditions.  At the same time, I attended Church and Sunday school where I was learning Christian stories and praying to Jesus.  While I didn’t fully realize it till many years later, from the very beginning of my life, my parents thought it important that I learn the ways of the interfaith movement.  This deeply shaped my identity and foreshadowed my present vocation as an ordained Presbyterian minister who works as a college chaplain with the Interfaith community at TCU.

     

    Now, my journey in becoming an advocate for interfaith cooperation wasn’t always a smooth one.  There were times in my life when I would treat people of other religions with disrespect and even prejudice.  There was a certain time in high school, when I was struggling with growing up and the difficulties of being a teenager.  I was trying to fit in and claim my power in the world.

     

     That’s when the influence of the other side of the faith line, the totalitarian side, took hold of my life.  In an arrogant tone, I told my Jewish friend, a friend that I met in preschool at the Jewish Center that he was going to hell.  I said, “Nate, you know you and your relatives are going to hell.  Jesus is the only way.   I pray everyday that God will have mercy on you.”  When he heard those powerful words come out of my mouth, he looked at me with disbelief and tears rolled down his cheeks.  “I never thought you would be like them,” he replied.  It took months for our friendship to recover.  Just like Eric Rudolph, I had learned this way of behaving from others in school.  I co-opted religion to bully my friend.

     

    There is nothing wrong with a Christian who believes Jesus is the only way, that’s what makes Christianity unique and beautiful.  But the problem with my treatment of Nate was not my Christian identity, but how I used religion to bully and disrespect him.  My motivation was not honest sharing of my beliefs out of love and respect of his uniqueness, which is a hallmark of interfaith cooperation.  Rather, out of insecurity, I was trying to feel better about myself by putting him down.  Out of the confusion of growing up and trying to figure out life, it was much easier to build up my ego by treating him as less than human. I was comforted to know that at least my friend Nate was a worse off than me.  There is a feeling of power, of belonging, of identity, when you dehumanize other groups of people.  Very similar to how gangs work, this ideology makes you feel safe and right and powerful.  It gives you your identity.  And eventually this way of treating others turns into a posture of hatred, of building bombs instead of bridges—like Eric Rudolph in our opening story. 

     

    Like I said before, there is nothing wrong in believing that Jesus is God or that Mohammed is prophet.  Many people who do interfaith dialogue believe the particularities of their religion, but in doing so they also respect other’s beliefs and views.  They listen and leave room for mystery.  It’s easy to love someone who is the same, but the real challenge is loving someone who is different. If you respect their humanity and their dignity, treat them with an open mind and heart, and engage them in deep meaningful conversations--this is where the magic of interfaith cooperation happens.  Eboo Patel wrote in his book, that “the heart of even the most ardent religious believer will provide more accurate clues to his or her behavior that the theology of his or her faith.”  It is the heart that matters when we relate to the diversity of fellow humans, it is our heart that matters when we cooperate to make the world better for us all.   

     

    One of the main tasks of upper school is finding your identity.  Discovering who you are, what you believe, and how you will act in response.  But this task is quite difficult and confusing.  There are so many influences in our culture, so many people and groups that compete for our attention and for our commitment.  And the task of developing your religious identity may be the most difficult task of all because it carries with it questions of death, afterlife, meaning, truth,  and morality. These are the very deepest questions of our existence.  When we attend to these questions, we have so much to gain and so much to lose.  There is this unparalleled power and weight associated with this journey.  

     

    It could have gone either way for me in high school. I could have continued down the path towards bigotry that I flirted with in my interactions with my Jewish friend, Nate.  But thankfully, with the help of many mentors, I followed the path of Interfaith cooperation.  And it has changed my life forever.  It has become my passion and my life’s work.

     

    It’s no mistake that most of my heroes are deeply religious people who have both stayed true to their own religious identity, and at the same time, they have cooperated with those of different religions to make the world better.  Martin Luther King, Jr., a Baptist minister, held hands with Abraham Heschel, a Jewish Rabbi, in the march from Selma to Montgomery during the civil rights movement.  Mahatma Gandhi stated that Hindu-Muslim unity was just as important to him as a free India.   A quotation from the Dalai Lama reads, “My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness.”

     

    Even locally, here in Fort Worth at a coffeehouse, the former pastor of McKinney Bible Church would meet with a rabbi from a local Jewish synagogue for deep conversation on faith and religion.  The pastor and the rabbi shared a common bond, not of the same religious beliefs, but deep faith. Their passion for their own unique tradition is what brought them together.

     

    Thomas Merton, a 20th Century Catholic monk and spiritual writer, said that the deeper and more mature your faith is in a particular tradition, the more you will be able to appreciate the depth and beauty of religions other than your own.

     

    Let me debunk a myth of interfaith cooperation: Some people are suspicious of doing interfaith dialogue because they are worried of losing their own particular religious identity.  They are worried that by deeply sharing with the religious other, they will either be converted or their faith will become watered down.  But this isn’t true.  Actually, the opposite is true. By talking to people of other faiths, one’s own faith background is strengthened and deepened. 

     

    For example, at TCU, the Muslim students are dedicated to their prayer life.  They come into our multifaith prayer room 5 times a day to pray.  And when I dialogue with them about it, it doesn’t make me want to pray Muslim prayers and abandon my Christian identity, rather it leads me to want to pray Christian prayers in a deeper and more meaningful way.  And through the process, I have learned about another religion which breaks down dangerous stereotypes and prejudice, and I have gotten to know a person of another religion more deeply, building trust and respect.  Just think of the transformation that would take place in our society if everyone began talking to people of other faiths in an open and loving way?

     

    You might also be thinking, what about the call to spread our religions throughout the world?  In my faith, Christianity, this is known as evangelism or the Great Commission.  Doesn’t interfaith cooperation and dialogue discourage spreading the good news of the gospel?  Well, the answer is no.  Actually interfaith cooperation encourages telling the story of your religion to others.  I am invited to share the good news of my Christianity!  But rather than force others to agree with me, I am reminded to treat others with respect and be open to learning about their beliefs.  While we may disagree about which faith is better, about theology or doctrine, we can agree that we must work together to spread love and kindness throughout the world.  And isn’t that the heart of my Christian faith, to be Jesus Christ’s hands and feet in  the world, feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and healing the sick?

     

    As you know, I serve as the Associate Chaplain at Texas Christian University where I help to create a campus community of interfaith cooperation. 

     

    But you may be asking yourself, I thought Texas Christian University was a Christian school, why would it support the exploration and cultivation of many different faiths?  You wouldn’t be alone.  Many students that come to TCU are surprised that TCU isn’t more specifically Christian.  I often hear students say, that the ‘letter C’ in TCU has disappeared.  I also hear people say that the University prefers to be known as the acronym TCU instead of the full name Texas Christian University.  I guess they hope people will forget what the ‘letter C’ represents.  But when I have conversations like these, I remind our community members that we are a Christian University, started by the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), to carry out a Christian mission in education.  The mission is not to force our students to practice as Christians, nor is it to remove religious experience totally from campus life in order to avoid the complexities of pluralism, but rather, our mission is to respect  and nurture each individual’s search for religious identity.  Our Christian institution feels that the richest environment for education is a multi-faith environment.  It is because TCU is a Christian school that we value diversity and pluralism.  It is because TCU is Christian that we respect, empathize, and remain open to other’s unique faith expressions, because we too have our own unique faith background.

     

     Texas Christian University’s mission statement is:  To educate individuals to think and act as ethical leaders and responsible citizens in the global community.”  Since our global community is so religiously diverse and since religion is such a powerful guide for so many people’s lives around the world, we believe at TCU, that in order for our students to be leaders in the global community, we must promote interfaith cooperation.  We must educate our students about the various world religions and explore how we all can work together.  This is so important for America’s educational institutions that the government has recently encouraged presidents of colleges and universities around the country to make interfaith cooperation central to their respective mission statements. 

     

    I am the staff advisor for the Interfaith Community at TCU which is an organization made up of students from many different faith backgrounds, students that are seeking a tradition, and students that have no faith.  The mission of the group is to spread awareness about interfaith cooperation, educating campus about the many faith traditions, doing service projects, and advocating for social justice by teaming up with non-profit organizations, like the Tarrant Area Food Bank and Amnesty International.  Recently, we just held our big event to raise awareness of interfaith cooperation and religious diversity on campus.  We called the event TCU Coexists.  At the event, we invited non-Muslim students and staff to wear hijabs, the traditional Muslim head scarf for women, as an act of solidarity.  We held Buddhist meditation and played Hindu music. We invited people to decorate pots and plant seeds for secular humanist environmental sustainability.  We raised awareness about Jewish holidays and Christian denominations.  And we invited people to sign the pledge to coexist on campus.  I invite you to watch a short video of our students that we interviewed at the event…(video clip).

     

    So what about some practical thoughts on how to further a climate of interfaith dialogue and pluralism?  In thinking about these practical suggestions, I’ve borrowed some inspiration from an article written by Victor Kazanjian, chaplain at Wellesley College. 

     

    My first thought is this: Ultimately, this is about education, not religion.  We should ask the question, how does religion and spirituality enhance the education of our students?  The first step is to begin having that conversation with each other.  Questions that students at Wellesley College asked the community were:

     

    “I am a scholar and I am spiritual.  Are these two parts of one person? Or am I two people separated from myself by the split in education between mind and spirit?”

     

    Another student asked: “Why must I leave the religious part of myself outside the door of my classes, only to enter and encounter writings of those who were inspired by their religious faith?”

     

    And a third wondered: “How can I understand the role that religion plays in the world around me, if I do not have the opportunity to understand the role that religion plays in the life of my classmates?”

     

    The fourth said: “In terms of my religion, I am invisible. My professors, they look at me, see the color of my skin and think they know my story. I am African-American and I am Jewish. How can they see me, if they do not know me? And how can they teach me, if they do not see me?”

     

    For my second thought, I believe a community must be willing to move beyond tolerance.  Tolerance of religious difference doesn’t require people to love, support, and dialogue with those that are different, rather tolerance just means that we will merely put up with each other.  Stopping at mere tolerance keeps us isolated, and prohibits the transformation and growth that interfaith cooperation can create in a community. 

     

    My third thought is: since our society, and our high schools, have many years of Christian embedded structure and privilege, whether these are explicit or more invisible, moving towards a multi-faith learning environment will make some people unhappy.  Even at a non-sectarian school such as Trinity Valley, there are some subtle Christian structures of privilege apparent, such as class letting out for winter break during Christmas, while class is in session during Jewish Chanukah, Muslim Ramadan, and other high-holidays.  We, Christians, that have held privilege as the dominant religion culturally, much of this privilege being invisible to us to us, will feel a sense of loss and pain as we lose that privilege.  It’s not going to feel good, and some people will oppose the change.  But moving to a more pluralistic environment is something that must be done, so being aware of this grief felt by the Christians, is necessary for the community to negotiate the transition.

     

    My last thought is that by including everyone at the table, there will be more food for everyone.  The search for meaning and wisdom in the educational institutions needs to be a multi-faith search, where all diversity is valued, where the depth of religious and spiritual experience is brought together with scholarly inquiry. My last thought is that by including everyone at the table, there will be more food for everyone. The search for meaning and wisdom in the educational institutions needs to be a multi-faith search, where all diversity is valued, where the depth of religious and spiritual experience is brought together with scholarly inquiry. Maybe then, when these two worlds forge a partnership together, our students, the future leaders of the world, will be able to solve the struggles that face our global community.
    There is a wealth of religious diversity here at TVS, in Fort Worth, in Texas. Texas alone boasts 10 percent of the 6 million Muslims living in the USA. Texas is home to over 100 Buddhist centers. Dallas has one of the largest Hare Krishna, Hindu communities in the USA. Texas has the third most Interfaith Centers among the 50 states, only behind California and New York. So I urge us to see that diversity as a beautiful gift that can contribute to making our community better and to the fight against injustice. I hope we begin to answer the question of the faith line on the side of pluralism and interfaith cooperation.

    I want to leave you with a poem by Sufi Muslim mystic, Ibn Arabi. Arabi lived in present day Spain in the 12th and 13th centuries when Jews, Christians, and Muslims lived peacefully together in a community of interfaith cooperation.

    My heart has grown capable of taking on all forms
    It is a pasture for gazelles
    A table for the Torah
    A convent for Christian monks
    A Ka’bah for the Pilgrim and the pages of the Koran
    Whichever way love’s caravan shall lead
    That shall be the way of my faith

    spanspanspanspan

    Posted via email from Chaplain Jake Hofmeister